Sunday, August 17, 2008

Why are most of the Muslims fundamentalists and terrorists?

Question:

Why are most of the Muslims fundamentalists and terrorists?


Answer:


This question is often hurled at Muslims, either directly or indirectly, during any


discussion on religion or world affairs. Muslim stereotypes are perpetuated in every


form of the media accompanied by gross misinformation about Islam and Muslims.


In fact, such misinformation and false propaganda often leads to discrimination and


acts of violence against Muslims. A case in point is the anti-Muslim campaign in the


American media following the Oklahoma bomb blast, where the press was quick to


declare a ‘Middle Eastern conspiracy’ behind the attack. The culprit was later


identified as a soldier from the American Armed Forces.


Let us analyze this allegation of ‘fundamentalism’ and ‘terrorism’:


1. Definition of the word ‘fundamentalist’


A fundamentalist is a person who follows and adheres to the fundamentals of


the doctrine or theory he is following. For a person to be a good doctor, he


should know, follow, and practise the fundamentals of medicine. In other words,


he should be a fundamentalist in the field of medicine. For a person to be a


good mathematician, he should know, follow and practise the fundamentals of


mathematics. He should be a fundamentalist in the field of mathematics. For a


person to be a good scientist, he should know, follow and practise the


fundamentals of science. He should be a fundamentalist in the field of science.


2. Not all ‘fundamentalists’ are the same


One cannot paint all fundamentalists with the same brush. One cannot


categorize all fundamentalists as either good or bad. Such a categorization of


any fundamentalist will depend upon the field or activity in which he is a


fundamentalist. A fundamentalist robber or thief causes harm to society and is


therefore undesirable. A fundamentalist doctor, on the other hand, benefits


society and earns much respect.


3. I am proud to be a Muslim funda-mentalist


I am a fundamentalist Muslim who, by the grace of Allah, knows, follows and


strives to practise the fundamentals of Islam. A true Muslim does not shy away


from being a fundamentalist. I am proud to be a fundamentalist Muslim


because, I know that the fundamentals of Islam are beneficial to humanity and


the whole world. There is not a single fundamental of Islam that causes harm or


is against the interests of the human race as a whole. Many people harbour


misconceptions about Islam and consider several teachings of Islam to be


unfair or improper. This is due to insufficient and incorrect knowledge of Islam.


If one critically analyzes the teachings of Islam with an open mind, one cannot


escape the fact that Islam is full of benefits both at the individual and collective


levels.


4. Dictionary meaning of the word ‘fundamentalist’


According to Webster’s dictionary ‘fundamentalism’ was a movement in


American Protestanism that arose in the earlier part of the 20th century. It was


a reaction to modernism, and stressed the infallibility of the Bible, not only in


matters of faith and morals but also as a literal historical record. It stressed on


belief in the Bible as the literal word of God. Thus fundamentalism was a word


initially used for a group of Christians who believed that the Bible was the


verbatim word of God without any errors and mistakes.


According to the Oxford dictionary ‘fundamentalism’ means ‘strict maintenance


of ancient or fundamental doctrines of any religion, especially Islam’.


Today the moment a person uses the word fundamentalist he thinks of a Muslim


who is a terrorist.


5. Every Muslim should be a terrorist


Every Muslim should be a terrorist. A terrorist is a person who causes terror.


The moment a robber sees a policeman he is terrified. A policeman is a terrorist


for the robber. Similarly every Muslim should be a terrorist for the antisocial


elements of society, such as thieves, dacoits and rapists. Whenever such an


anti-social element sees a Muslim, he should be terrified. It is true that the word


‘terrorist’ is generally used for a person who causes terror among the common


people. But a true Muslim should only be a terrorist to selective people i.e. antisocial


elements, and not to the common innocent people. In fact a Muslim


should be a source of peace for innocent people.


6. Different labels given to the same individual for the same action,


i.e. ‘terrorist’ and ‘patriot’


Before India achieved independence from British rule, some freedom fighters of


India who did not subscribe to non-violence were labeled as terrorists by the


British government. The same individuals have been lauded by Indians for the


same activities and hailed as ‘patriots’. Thus two different labels have been


given to the same people for the same set of actions. One is calling him a


terrorist while the other is calling him a patriot. Those who believed that Britain


had a right to rule over India called these people terrorists, while those who


were of the view that Britain had no right to rule India called them patriots and


freedom fighters.


It is therefore important that before a person is judged, he is given a fair hearing.


Both sides of the argument should be heard, the situation should be analyzed,


and the reason and the intention of the person should be taken into account,


and then the person can be judged accordingly.


7. Islam means peace


Islam is derived from the word ‘salaam’ which means peace. It is a religion of


peace whose fundamentals teach its followers to maintain and promote peace


throughout the world.


Thus every Muslim should be a fundamentalist i.e. he should follow the


fundamentals of the Religion of Peace: Islam. He should be a terrorist only towards


the antisocial elements in order to promote peace and justice in the society.

1 comment:

  1. It is true that behind every mass movement or idea, an ‘ism’ is attached. This ‘ism’ is often coherent with the ideology of the followers or a name quoted by media. It is the media, who have reserved the word ‘terrorism’ exclusively for Jihadis! All others who are involved in such activities are given different ‘isms’ that either glorify their work or softens their acts of terror!

    So terrorists in Jharkhand are called ‘maoists’ or ‘naxals’. Terrorists in the north-eastern states are called ‘militants’. Tamil terrorists in Sri Lanka are dubbed as ‘tigers’ while the Irish terrorists were ‘separatists’. Terrorists in Africa are ‘insurgents’, The Cuban terrorists were ‘rebels’, the Hungarian ones were ‘extremists’, the Chinese terrorists are ‘radicals’ and the American terrorists are ‘counter-insurgents’. The Israeli terrorists are ‘commandos’ and the communist terrorists are ‘revolutionaries’

    Visit- http://souravroy.com/

    ReplyDelete

Dear blog visitor, Thanks for visiting my blog.